نظریہ نظرثانی:دائرہ کار اور تاریخی پس منظر Revisionism: Scope and Historical Perspective Section Urdu


Muhammad Ikram Allah
Mohammad Ferozuddin Shah Khagha



The basic aim of this paper is to define Revisionism, provide scope, methodological needs and well- known history of revisionism .Many tools and methodologies have been taken up by orientalists in modern era to examine and re-examine the past works. Revisionism is one of them. This approach has achieved great popularity among various circles of orientalists. Some of them adopted it as a field of study. They are called revisionists. Revisionists are of the view that application of revisionism on Islamic sources is indispensable and inevitable like other scientific, social and historical studies so that their authenticity may be determined. However, they have ulterior motives to undermine the accuracy and veracity of Islam and its teachings. So, it is dire need to understand this approach and examine its history.



How to Cite
Muhammad Ikram Allah, & Mohammad Ferozuddin Shah Khagha. (2021). نظریہ نظرثانی:دائرہ کار اور تاریخی پس منظر . Al Qalam, 25(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.51506/al-qalam.v25i2.866


Dr. C.Nordbruch . “ Die selbaternannten Tugendwachter Im Visier schalltet political correctness das eintige volk der Denker gleich”?The Neuer Zurcher Zeitung.Vol .18, no.4(December 15 ,1999).
Yahuda D.Nevo & Judith Koren, “Methodological Approaches to Islamic Studies”, in the Quest for the Historical Muhammad, ed. Ibn Warraq, (New York: Prometheus Books, 2000), 420.
Nevo & Koren, “Methodological Approaches to Islamic Studies”, ed. Ibn Warraq, 420-21 .
http://Germarrudolf.com/germar’s –views/an- introduction – to historical-revisionism/ 301- Lectures – on – the – Holocaust /Sylvia Stolz AZK .Last Accessed on May 5 , 2015.
میورکے نظریات کا اچھا ادراک اس کی مناظرانہ تحریروں سے حاصل کیا جا سکتا ہے ؛بالخصوص The Mohammedan Controversyملاحظہ کی جا سکتی ہے۔
Maywr kay nẓryat ka achha adrak is kī mnaẓranh tḥrīrūṉ say ḥaṣl kīa ja skta hay ;bilkhṣūṣ The Mohammedan Controversy mlaḥẓh kī ja sktī hay.
Sprenger, The Life Of Mohammad ;
A. Sprenger, Das Leben Und Die Lehre Des Mohammad Nach Bisher Grösstentheils Unbenutzten Quellen Bearbeitet, 1861-1865, Three Volumes, Nicolai'sche Verlagsbuchh.: Berlin ; Muir, The Mohammedan Controversy, 106-118.
Ibn Warraq,The Quest for the Historical Muhammad, 44 (Hurgronye),49 (Morozor and Klimovich).
E. Note crone and Cok , Hagarism , VII:
G. Hawting, “John Wansbrough, Islam and monotheism”, Method and Theory in Study of Religion, 9(1997):24.
I. Goldziher, Muhammedanische Studien, (Halle: Niemeyer, 1888).II
J. Schacht, The Origins Of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950), 165.
G. Luling , Uber den ur koran. Ansatze zur Rekonstruction der vorislamische-christlichen Strophenlieder in koran, 2nd ed. (Erlangen:Verlagsbuchhandlung H. Luling, 1993).
A. Noth , The Early Arabic Historical Tradition: A Source-Critical Study, and rev, ed n. (Princeton, N.J.:Darwin Press, 1994).
Biography of Henry –Belgian Royal Academy for Oversease Sciences
Ibn Warraq, Quest for the Historical Muhammad, 169-329.
W. Madelung, The Succession to Muhammad : A Study of the Early Caliphate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
M. Whittow, The making of Byzantiam, 600-1025 (Berkeley, calif.: University of Califor nia Press, 1996).
G. Fowden, Empire to Commonwealth: Consequences of Monotheism in Late Antiquity (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1993).
H. Suermann, Die geschichts theologische Reaktion auf die einfallenden Muslime in der edessenischen Apokalyptik des 7. Jahrhunderts, Europaische Hochschulschriften, series 23: Theologie (Frankfurt:Lang, 1985) ; R. Hoyland, Seeing Islam as Others Saw it: A Survey and Evaluation of Christian, Jews, and Zoroastrian Writings on ealy Islam, Studies in Late Antiquity and Early Islam, (Princeton, N. J.: Darwin Press, 1977).XIII
J. Wansbrough, Qur'anic Studies: Sources & Methods Of Scriptural Interpretation, London Oriental Series Volume 31,( Oxford :Oxford University Press, 1977) 49-52.
قرآن کے ابتدائی مسودات کی بابت ہمارے موجودہ علم کو دیکھتے ہوئے ، وانس برو کے نظریہ کو بآسانی رد کیا جا سکتا ہے ۔ پہلی صدی ہجری کے تنہا مسودات پر مبنی قرآن کے تمام تر متن کی دوبارہ نقل تیا ر کی جا سکتی ہے ، جو کہ اس عرصہ میں غیر نمائندگی شدہ مکمّل متن کا 17 فی صد ہے ۔نوسیڈا کے تخمینہ میں پہلی صدی کے کوفی مسودات شامل نہیں ہیں ، تمام تر قرآنی کتبے اور تمام حجازی مسودات صنعاء کے مقام پر پائے جاتے ہیں ۔
qrʾan kay abtdaʾī msūdat kī babt hmaray mūjūdh ʿlm kū daykhtay hūway , wans brū kay nẓryh kū bʾasanī rd kīa ja skta hay .phlī ṣdī hjrī kay tnha msūdat pr mbnī qrʾan kay tmam tr mtn kī dūbarh nql tyar kī ja sktī hay, jū kh is ʿrṣh mīṉ ghayr nmaʾindgī shdh mkml mtn ka 17 fī ṣd hay. Nūsayḏa kay tkhmīnh mīṉ phlī ṣdī kay kūfī msūdat shaml nhīṉ hīṉ , tmam tr qrʾanī ktbay aūr tmam ḥjazī msūdat ṣnʿaʾ kay mqam pr paʾay jaty hīṉ
See F. Déroche and S. N. Noseda (Eds.), Sources de la transmission manuscrite du texte coranique. I. Les manuscrits de style hijazi. Tome I. Le manuscrit Or. 2165 (f. 1 à 61) de la British Library, (Fondazione Ferni Noja Noseda, Leda, and British Library: London, 2001), 2/ 27 ; Also see S. N. Noseda, "Parerga To The Volumes Of Sources De La Transmission Manuscrite Du Texte Coranique» Thus Far Published And In Course Of Publication" in M. S. Kropp (Ed.), Results Of Contemporary Research On The Qur'ān: The Question Of A Historio-Critical Text Of The Qur'ān,( Beirut: Orient-Institute, 2007), 163.
اس ثبوت پر بحث کرتے ہوئے نوسیڈا ، وانسبرو کے نظریہ کو مسترد کر دیتا ہے ۔ تاریخ ، وہ کہتا ہے ، اس بات کا تعین کرے گی آیا کہ اس پر عرف "Lusitania" یا "Titanic" کا اطلاق کیا جائے ۔172
is thbūt pr bḥth krtay hūʾay nūsayḏa , wansbrū kay nẓryh kū mstrd kr dayta hay tarīkh , wh khta hay , is bat ka tʿyn kray gī aya kh is pr ʿrf "Lusitania" ya "Titanic" ka iṭlaq kya jaʾay 172
Crone and Cook, Hagarism , esp. 3-34.
G. R. Hawting, "The origins of the Muslim Sanctuary at Mecca," in Studies in the First Century of Islamic Society, ed. G.H.A.Juyn boll, Papers on Islamic History,5 (Carbondale,III.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982), 23-47.
Patricia Crone and Martin Hinds , God’s Caliph: Religious Authorities in the First Centuries of Islam (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Oriental Publications, 2003) , 26-28.
Koren & Nevo, "Methodological Approaches To Islamic Studies , 92-93.
Crone, Mecean Trade .
Peter Brown , The World of Late Antiquity: AD 150- 750 (New York : Harcourt Brace Jonavich Press , 1971), 189.
اور ارض ا یران اور مذہب اسلام کو شامل کیا ہے ، یہ تمام تر اس کے نظریات نہیں ہیں ؛ مثال کے طور پر اس کی (ہنری پائرن ) فکر کہ بحر روم میں اسلام کی آمد نے Late Antiquity کے اختتام پر مہر لگا دی درست ہے ۔
aūr arḍ ayran aūr mdhhb islam kū shaml kīa hay,yh tmam tr is kay nẓryat nhīṉ hīṉ ; mthal kay ṭūr pr is kī ( hnrī paʾirn ) fkr kh bḥr rūm mīṉ islam kī āmd nay Late Antiquity kay ikhttam pr mhr lga dī drst hay.
J. Herrin, The Formation of Christendom (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), 134.
A. Stille, "Scholars are quietly offering new theories of the Quran", The New York Times, March 2,2002, A1 and A19.
T. Lester, “What is the Koran?" Anlantic Monthly, 283, 1999, 43-56; available at http:// www.theatlantic.com/issues/99 jan/Koran. htm
S. Theil, " Challenging the Quran
, "Newsweek international, July 28,2003.